Thanks, I should have been more accurate in my initial description.  It is
a hall effect sensor.

Scott


On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Bruce Layne
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On 11/11/2012 03:00 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
>
> > ...plus a magnetic reed switch that triggers once per chuck revolution.
>
> I wouldn't use any mechanical switch in that application.  There's a
> chance it won't be able to respond fast enough at the faster spindle
> speeds, but I'd be much more concerned about reliability.  Most
> mechanical switches are rated for mechanical life, independent of
> contact wear from making and breaking current.  Even with no current
> flowing through the switch, most switches are rated for something in the
> ballpark of 100,000 to 1,000,000 switch activations.  That's a lot if
> you're pushing a button, but if you're racking up 2000 switch
> activations per minute for the spindle index pulse, you'll reach 100,000
> in 50 minutes of spindle time.
>
> I'd be looking at a solid state switch with no moving parts... either a
> Hall effect switch for that magnet, or I'd use a slot or a hole in an
> opaque disk with an optical interrupter.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to