On Saturday 10 May 2014 20:04:55 Jon Elson did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On 05/10/2014 05:09 PM, Erik Friesen wrote:
> > Why?  I obviously have some complete lack of understanding this hal
> > scheme.
> 
> Oh, the same signal name can be used later to link
> ADDITIONAL pins
> to the same signal.
> 
> Jon

Let me correct that just a tad Jon.  Those ADDITIONAL pins must be other 
module input pins.  You can not wire two outputs together here, any more 
than you can in normal logic.  IIRC hal will fuss about it and bail out.

> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7
> to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
> • Requirements for releasing software faster
> • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to