I also remember someone, could have been at reprap.org or cncrouterparts.com, doing repeatability tests, and getting similar surprisingly consistent results with cheap switches.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Len Shelton <l...@probotix.com> wrote: > We don't use levers, we activate the plungers directly. The key is to > design the switch mount such that a physical stop would prevent wrecking > the plastic switch on a rapid jogs ooops. > > >Len > > > > On 2/15/2016 6:37 PM, Bertho Stultiens wrote: > > On 02/16/2016 01:16 AM, Len Shelton wrote: > >> We in fact see about 2-3 tenths of a thou repeatibility with a slow > >> approach on cheap chinese snap switches. > > Just like what others seem to report. > > > > Is that on direct activation or using an positional offset on a lever? > > > > Using a lever seems like introducing a variable due to spring forces. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
