On 22.01.17 11:08, Gene Heskett wrote:

> The faceplate hub looks and measures pretty close to cylindrical, but
> it is a rough surfaced forgeing or cast steel surface I am looking at,
> and I'd druther it was trued, which means I'd have to separate it from
> the chuck and turn it around on the spindle to gain access to taking
> off a thou or 5 while making it cylindrical and concentric.

That'd work, and as ISTR the chuck isn't dead concentric now, not a lot
of precious alignment has to be restored. If I had a screw-on chuck,
then a bit of Murphy-insurance would be my priority too.

...
> Its no biggie to me if I have to chuck up a 1/2" piece of A2, put a dial 
> of it and work the chuck over with a dead blow hammer to restore its 
> grippers to .0001" runout when I'm done. Its a medium priced 3 jaw with 
> 2 piece jaws. I have serious doubts it even has the ability to match 
> that if the 1/2" A2 is loosened & retightened.  But I'll find out in due 
> time...

Looking for alternatives to assault & battery, the jaws can be ground
while expanded inside a ring, for concentricity in that role, but how
would you grind the inside of jaws clamped on something? Drill a hole in
each jaw when it's closed tight, fit pins, and then grip a ring on the
outside while grinding?

Pretty good is as good as an affordable self-centering chuck gets, I
figure. And I guess that in use, you'll just perform all turning
operations requiring concentricity in one workholding, so it doesn't
matter if there's a thou or two of eccentricity.

Erik

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to