On 10/10/2017 05:49 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
John,
Let me save you some time. Unless you are retiring in the next couple of years and swearing off everything CNC...convert to LinuxCNC now. If you are not happy with the performance on the BBB right now. Wait for a couple of years. It will get there via a different set of hardware or a different hardware version. Mach3 will not. Mach4 might... but you know more than me about that. If you want a tool that "just works" yet can be extended "reliably" via software, LinuxCNC or Machinekit is where it is at.
If you want both Mach3 and LinuxCNC, dual boot your PC.
You won't regret it.

Yes, I agree. I've been using EMC, EMC2 and now LinuxCNC for almost 20 years! Never ONCE had a failure of it to complete a part. Once, a long time ago, I remember I couldn't get it to start up, bad connection somewhere related to the encoders. I'm on the 4th computer now on my mill, mostly had to upgrade to get good performance as the GUIs caused more overhead. But, I don't mind, it isn't stupid bloat, 3D graphical preview DOES take resources.

I now have a Blum touch probe, and wrote a bunch of simple probing routines to find the center of holes and the inside and outside corners of parts. If the probe touches something when not expected, the machine stops. if the IR communication to the probe is lost, the machine also stops. Just great stuff! I built my own MPG jog box years ago, controlled through a small file of HAL commands. Needed a filter so the discrete steps of the MPG didn't buzz the servos, Jeff Epler threw together a little HAL component filter for me in a couple minutes at a meeting. If you can think it, you can pretty much do it with LinuxCNC.

Jon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to