My apologies.  Separating the parameters with a ',' is not the correct way.  A 
space must be used.   Now compiled with RAD Studio XE7 C++ it works properly.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Dammeyer [mailto:jo...@autoartisans.com]
> Sent: September-22-19 2:12 PM
> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Feasibility of moving from 2.5 to 2.8
> 
> Hi Jon,
> Had to use an older WIN XP version to run the 32 bit version of the program
> for mbij.exe.
> Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
> 
> P:\CNC>mbij
> Enter Starting X,Y (real):1.0,2.0
> Enter Tool Diameter, Bore Diameter (real):0.125,0.5
> Enter Feed Rate (IPM), Width of Cut (real):10.0,0.05
> Enter Finish Feed Rate, Width of Cut (real):5.0,0.01
> Enter Z Depth per Pass, Bore Depth:0.05,0.1
> Enter File Name for CAM output:
> Width of Cut too large to spiral out to requested bore.
> P:\CNC>
> 
> Doesn't seem to like the parameters as per your example and the source
> code and wait for the file name.
> 
>   if (BoreRadius - ToolRadius - FinishWOC <= WidthOfCut)
>     {
>       printf("Width of Cut too large to spiral out to requested bore.\n");
>       exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>     }
> 
> Width Of Cut is 0.050
> BoreRadius is 0.5/2=0.25,
> ToolRadius is 0.125/2=0.06125,
> FinishWOC is 0.01
> 0.25-0.06125-0.01 = 0.1788 which is not less than Width of Cut of 0.05 so the
> source code is correct but the program is complaining.
> 
> Strange eh?
> 
> The reason I even tried this is because the IJ version of my converted
> program is producing odd motion.  Need to dig into more what the IJ stuff
> does.  Thought I'd compare it with yours but yours doesn't run.
> 
> I'll let you know what I find.
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to