> On 19 Jul 2021, at 7:13 am, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote: > > On Sunday 18 July 2021 16:17:31 Mark Wendt wrote: > >> It's still a topic because the Code is still up. Do you agree with >> everything included in the Code? >> >> Mark > > No Mark, I don't, and the reason has been discussed to death. I am a CET, > and when I read of someone violating a basic electrical assembly rule > because they are mechanical, not electronicly minded, I feel obligated > to try and enlighten, which could be construed as offering too much > help. And that is against the CoC as it exists. Remove that, and the > rest becomes a non-issue, so why have it in the list at all. Quite > simply, we don't need it, any of it.
I thought that had been removed. > > I've been here for 18 years under 2 or 3 names, and my only entanglment > has been with Seb, who doesn't like a jpeg image sharp enough to show > the problem. Sure, I run everything I post thru gimp, smunchng it until > I start to see jpeg artifacts. But that limit means they must be below > 200k raw because the base64 used for images in email expands it. I can > make any image good at half a meg base64'd, but the jpeg artifacts get > pretty obvious below 200k. So I don't post where one pix is better than > 1000 words. > [...] > > No Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. > - Louis D. Brandeis > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
