I didn't ask if it was commonplace. I asked if you agreed with everything
in it. Just because something may be commonplace doesn't necessarily mean
its good.

On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 16:34 Feral Engineer <theferalengin...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> i just glanced at it again, it's pretty commonplace. Unless all of the
> admins all agree to enforce the code, it's pretty much going to be handled
> by an army of one and forgotten about the second people stop feeding into
> it negatively.
>
> Phil T.
> The Feral Engineer
>
> Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
> www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer
>
> Help support my channel efforts and coffee addiction:
> www.patreon.com/theferalengineer
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 4:20 PM Mark Wendt <wendt.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's still a topic because the Code is still up. Do you agree with
> > everything included in the Code?
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 15:47 Feral Engineer <theferalengin...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I find it hard to believe that this is still a topic of discussion.
> > Simply
> > > put, just don't be a jerk. Done. Move on with your day.
> > >
> > > Back to vinyl siding for me...
> > >
> > > Phil T.
> > > The Feral Engineer
> > >
> > > Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
> > > www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer
> > >
> > > Help support my channel efforts and coffee addiction:
> > > www.patreon.com/theferalengineer
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 3:29 PM Mark Wendt <wendt.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Since we're not signing up new members by the dozens, and the vast
> > > majority
> > > > of the group has been on this list for ages, grandfathering everybody
> > > makes
> > > > the CoC rather pointless don't you think? Perhaps even more so than
> it
> > > > already is?
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 14:39 Stuart Stevenson <stus...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Gentlemen,
> > > > > Heh - seems to me a LARGE portion of the group should be
> > grandfathered
> > > in
> > > > > with any COC not applying to participants not having agreed to work
> > > under
> > > > > any COC restrictions or guidelines. Going forward agreement to be
> > bound
> > > > by
> > > > > the COC could be made a part of the process welcoming new
> > participants.
> > > > > Retroactive agreement could be agreed to on a voluntary participant
> > by
> > > > > participant basis.
> > > > > I don't recall seeing a complaint process to report offenders.
> > > > > There could possibly be a couple more unintended consequences
> hiding
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > weeds. :)
> > > > > Just thinking out loud (or thinking while typing)
> > > > > You cannot imagine how long it took to type this. I can think and I
> > can
> > > > > type but combining the two abuses my backspace button.
> > > > > regards
> > > > > Stuart
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 1:23 PM Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sunday 18 July 2021 14:08:02 Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Who is the sheriff?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess it was Jeff Epler who wrote it up, but I don't know if
> > there
> > > > is a
> > > > > > designated sheriff.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 9:37 AM fxkl47BF via Emc-users <
> > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > > > The COC appears to be a compilation of what everyone on the
> > > list
> > > > > > > > > has been doing all along. Therefore, Jeff's comment, "a
> > > > > > > > > non-event", is
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > appropriate.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > it's "a non-event" until the sheriff bans you
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No Cheers, Gene Heskett
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> > > > > >  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> > > > > > -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> > > > > > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law
> > > > respectable.
> > > > > >  - Louis D. Brandeis
> > > > > > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Addressee is the intended audience.
> > > > > If you are not the addressee then my consent is not given for you
> to
> > > read
> > > > > this email furthermore it is my wish you would close this without
> > > saving
> > > > or
> > > > > reading, and cease and desist from saving or opening my private
> > > > > correspondence.
> > > > > Thank you for honoring my wish.
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to