I didn't ask if it was commonplace. I asked if you agreed with everything in it. Just because something may be commonplace doesn't necessarily mean its good.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 16:34 Feral Engineer <theferalengin...@gmail.com> wrote: > i just glanced at it again, it's pretty commonplace. Unless all of the > admins all agree to enforce the code, it's pretty much going to be handled > by an army of one and forgotten about the second people stop feeding into > it negatively. > > Phil T. > The Feral Engineer > > Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at > www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer > > Help support my channel efforts and coffee addiction: > www.patreon.com/theferalengineer > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 4:20 PM Mark Wendt <wendt.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It's still a topic because the Code is still up. Do you agree with > > everything included in the Code? > > > > Mark > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 15:47 Feral Engineer <theferalengin...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I find it hard to believe that this is still a topic of discussion. > > Simply > > > put, just don't be a jerk. Done. Move on with your day. > > > > > > Back to vinyl siding for me... > > > > > > Phil T. > > > The Feral Engineer > > > > > > Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at > > > www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer > > > > > > Help support my channel efforts and coffee addiction: > > > www.patreon.com/theferalengineer > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 3:29 PM Mark Wendt <wendt.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Since we're not signing up new members by the dozens, and the vast > > > majority > > > > of the group has been on this list for ages, grandfathering everybody > > > makes > > > > the CoC rather pointless don't you think? Perhaps even more so than > it > > > > already is? > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 14:39 Stuart Stevenson <stus...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gentlemen, > > > > > Heh - seems to me a LARGE portion of the group should be > > grandfathered > > > in > > > > > with any COC not applying to participants not having agreed to work > > > under > > > > > any COC restrictions or guidelines. Going forward agreement to be > > bound > > > > by > > > > > the COC could be made a part of the process welcoming new > > participants. > > > > > Retroactive agreement could be agreed to on a voluntary participant > > by > > > > > participant basis. > > > > > I don't recall seeing a complaint process to report offenders. > > > > > There could possibly be a couple more unintended consequences > hiding > > in > > > > the > > > > > weeds. :) > > > > > Just thinking out loud (or thinking while typing) > > > > > You cannot imagine how long it took to type this. I can think and I > > can > > > > > type but combining the two abuses my backspace button. > > > > > regards > > > > > Stuart > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 1:23 PM Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday 18 July 2021 14:08:02 Stuart Stevenson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who is the sheriff? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess it was Jeff Epler who wrote it up, but I don't know if > > there > > > > is a > > > > > > designated sheriff. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 9:37 AM fxkl47BF via Emc-users < > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > The COC appears to be a compilation of what everyone on the > > > list > > > > > > > > > has been doing all along. Therefore, Jeff's comment, "a > > > > > > > > > non-event", is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appropriate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's "a non-event" until the sheriff bans you > > > > > > > > > > > > No Cheers, Gene Heskett > > > > > > -- > > > > > > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > > > > > > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > > > > > > -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > > > > > > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law > > > > respectable. > > > > > > - Louis D. Brandeis > > > > > > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Addressee is the intended audience. > > > > > If you are not the addressee then my consent is not given for you > to > > > read > > > > > this email furthermore it is my wish you would close this without > > > saving > > > > or > > > > > reading, and cease and desist from saving or opening my private > > > > > correspondence. > > > > > Thank you for honoring my wish. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-users mailing list > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users