On Sun, 12 Dec, 2021 at 2:54 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
 

To: enhanced machine controller (emc)
I'm surprised that people don't use kinematics to remove the residual
alignment errors that can't be mechanically removed.   Of course, you can't
remove tool orientation errors this way.   If the z-axis is a few
milliradians "off" the tool will also be "off" but kinematics can
compensate for the X, Y error associated with variable Z movement.

That said, I can't measure this kind of low-level stuff so I don't worry
about it.

You should be able to lead the Z- column over at 45 degrees and still hit
X, Y point spot on. (it would work only for a spherical tool)



If it was moveable Chris,  but its not, the column is fixed, but the head can 
be 

rotated 90 degrees either way and I have several times. That works quite well. 

But there is no detent so it must be re-trammed when turning it vertical again.


I've not yet had a chance to look at non-trivial kinematics. Now I have and am
amazed at the lack of details as to how to configure for an out of square 
machine.
No clues at all.




-- 
Thanks Chris
Cheers, Gene
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
.
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to