Julien Cubizolles <[email protected]> writes:

> Yoni Rabkin <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I'll modify the metadata of the files I have and test with the cache
>> data as well. Thanks.
>
> At the moment, I'm using a fork (https://github.com/jreinert/MPD) of
> mpd that addresses this very issue ensuring that no duplicated entries
> are created in the tag_cache. But it would of course be better for
> emms to handle this kind of error in the tag_cache.

I'm sorry it has taken me so long to respond; the quotidian got the
better of me.

Since I'm unfamiliar with mpd I'd like to understand: is this a bug in
mpd which will be fixed upstream? Or is the point to make sure that Emms
doesn't get confused when reading from buggy software that provides
multiple, identical entries?

-- 
   "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice"

_______________________________________________
Emms-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help

Reply via email to