Julien Cubizolles <[email protected]> writes: > Yoni Rabkin <[email protected]> writes: > > >>> At the moment, I'm using a fork (https://github.com/jreinert/MPD) of >>> mpd that addresses this very issue ensuring that no duplicated entries >>> are created in the tag_cache. But it would of course be better for >>> emms to handle this kind of error in the tag_cache. >> >> I'm sorry it has taken me so long to respond; the quotidian got the >> better of me. > > Thanks a lot for taking the time to look into this. > >> Since I'm unfamiliar with mpd I'd like to understand: is this a bug in >> mpd which will be fixed upstream? > > To me it's a bug but the developper doesn't see it that way and won't > fix it. But I'm not the only one annoyed with it and someone patched > this problem in MPD > >> Or is the point to make sure that Emms doesn't get confused when >> reading from buggy software that provides multiple, identical entries? > > I wanted to let you know however that at the moment emms gets so > confused that it ends up with a completely wrong database. > > Also, have you seen my other message where I noticed that some entries > in a perfectly valid MPD database (without duplicates) seem to confuse > emms so that its entries mix up their titles/track numbers, in the emms > cache ? (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.emms.user/1768/)
That doesn't sound good. I'll look into that. -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice" _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
