Yoni Rabkin <[email protected]> writes:
>> At the moment, I'm using a fork (https://github.com/jreinert/MPD) of >> mpd that addresses this very issue ensuring that no duplicated entries >> are created in the tag_cache. But it would of course be better for >> emms to handle this kind of error in the tag_cache. > > I'm sorry it has taken me so long to respond; the quotidian got the > better of me. Thanks a lot for taking the time to look into this. > Since I'm unfamiliar with mpd I'd like to understand: is this a bug in > mpd which will be fixed upstream? To me it's a bug but the developper doesn't see it that way and won't fix it. But I'm not the only one annoyed with it and someone patched this problem in MPD > Or is the point to make sure that Emms doesn't get confused when > reading from buggy software that provides multiple, identical entries? I wanted to let you know however that at the moment emms gets so confused that it ends up with a completely wrong database. Also, have you seen my other message where I noticed that some entries in a perfectly valid MPD database (without duplicates) seem to confuse emms so that its entries mix up their titles/track numbers, in the emms cache ? (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.emms.user/1768/) Right now I have a good cache (created by emms-insert-directory-tree) that I can play with mpd in emms and I'm fine with it. Julien. _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
