> On 25.10.2016 16:52, Rasmus wrote: >> Yoni Rabkin <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> OK, so there is a good reason to move to C++ with this, which would >>> otherwise seem like overkill to me. >>> >>> Since we would want to test it a bit before packing it up into a release >>> it can hopefully go out with the release after this one (4.3, which is >>> scheduled for May 2017). >> >> That should be fine. I don't know what the status is of this ATM. > > Hello and apologies for not responding in a timely manner. For some > weird reason I had "dropped" EMMS folder in my own mail setup, so > these messages didn't catch me until now. > > The patch is ok. It's a really simple piece of C++98 so it ought to > work with almost any compiler. I haven't submitted the patch earlier > because the docs were missing. But I have updated the texinfo and the > man page, so I'll post the patch Real Soon Now. > > Some relevant copy-paste from correspondence with Rasmus last February: > > "Btw, there is also a (feature-wise) limited Perl implementation in > emms/src. emms.texi does not mention anything about it. The program > uses Audio::Scan which seems to be yet another C-based parser for many > open media formats. I think we should either drop it or at least > document it."
Can I please have the latest and greatest version of your C++ emms-print-metadata patch to install? I want people to be able to try it out well in advance of 4.3. -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice" _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
