On 04/06/2012 06:45 AM, pedro wrote:
not sure what you mean by a romance, susan, do you mean a fantasy ?
I was really kinda curious about that too... For sure, with the formerly
democratic societies in a state of total corruption, basically on the
edge of a new kind of fascism, and falling over that edge all the time,
politicized art practices that unfold in institutionally sanctioned
spaces often DO look like a fantasy. And when they don't, as in the
example of LABoral that Pedro gave, well, such experiments are often
closed down.
But what exactly do you think, Susan?
in this sense i think its very important on any debate about curating
to talk about open practises such as budgets being well documented and
communicated with the artists and public, the willingless to let
processes unfold outside of the narrative framework determined, what
licenses are used, the role (or absence) of collective processes, the
documentation ...
I'd like to hear more about the above, because those are serious
questions about the practice of curation, which otherwise are usually
tied so closely to the power structures of the capitalist/oligarchical
state which Ana talks about, that I tend to lose all interest. If you
want to check out what I mean by total corruption, read Andrea Fraser's
recent article "L'1% c'est moi," whose title indicates a very productive
anxiety about who we might be becoming in the world of art. And check
out the prototype of her and Jennifer Gradecki's "Artigarchy" project
which I hope will go viral and relieve Fraser of the evidently useless
and fruitless search for some institution that would "take it on" (I
think no such institution exists at present):
http://toddusandronicus.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/andrea-fraser-1.pdf
http://jennifergradecki.com/artigarchy.html
There is also quite an interesting video (I actually love this thing)
that was made a few years ago by Marysia Lewandowska and Neil Cummings,
about the possible transformation of art institutions. It's called
"Museum Futures: Distributed." It was commissioned by the Moderna Museet
for their 50th anniversary, and the strategy of the video is to take the
the commission quite seriously and project 50 years into the future to
see what an institution might become if Pedro's basic ideas - what you
might call democratic common sense - were actually implemented. If you
listen closely to what is being said, you realize that the new
institution only emerged after a great economic crisis and a period of
major social unrest:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rW6RbAXSo6I
There are three parts to the YouTube upload. The script by Neil Cummings
can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/museum-futures
subvert and enjoy, Brian
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre
