On 06/28/2012 05:56 AM, Timothy Morton wrote:
Lots of artists and musicians are now tuning into OOO.
Yes Ian's book contains some interesting examples.
The problem is that the defenses of OOO against charges of failing to
illustrate Marxism indicate that OOO aesthetics is probably a category
error as well.
You wrote:
"The object in itself being accessible as simply the sum of its unique (fnarr)
aesthetic properties valenced in terms of their efficacy at reflecting the ego of the
gentlemanly spectator is a vision of OOO that would cause its proponents to clop
furiously."
That's almost the opposite I'm afraid.
It *wouldn't* cause them to? ;-)
Back to the lab!
http://www.famousmonstersoffilmland.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/sjff_01_img0077.jpg
- Rob.
_______________________________________________
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre
