Since we have reached WG consensus on the method, can the authors of draft-zhou-emu-eap-fastv2-00.txt
please re-submit the document as: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-00.txt The reason for the name change is that there have been questions raised about whether this document should be left as EAP-FASTv2, or whether it should request allocation of a new EAP type. Since the document name (individual draft) currently reflects the EAP type name, abstracting that would be useful. That way the document name will not change no matter what the WG decides to do. Anyone with opinions either way is requested to discuss the pros and cons of the issue. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu