On 5/13/2011 10:29 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: > Since we have reached WG consensus on the method, can the authors of > > draft-zhou-emu-eap-fastv2-00.txt > > please re-submit the document as: > > draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-00.txt > > The reason for the name change is that there have been questions > raised about whether this document should be left as EAP-FASTv2, or > whether it should request allocation of a new EAP type. > > Since the document name (individual draft) currently reflects the EAP > type name, abstracting that would be useful. That way the document name > will not change no matter what the WG decides to do. > > Anyone with opinions either way is requested to discuss the pros and > cons of the issue.
There seem to be two issues here: renaming the draft & allocating a new EAP type. For which one are opinions being solicited? ...
<<attachment: gwz.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
