On 5/13/2011 10:29 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:

>   Since we have reached WG consensus on the method, can the authors of
> 
>       draft-zhou-emu-eap-fastv2-00.txt
> 
> please re-submit the document as:
> 
>       draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-00.txt
> 
>   The reason for the name change is that there have been questions
> raised about whether this document should be left as EAP-FASTv2, or
> whether it should request allocation of a new EAP type.
> 
>   Since the document name (individual draft) currently reflects the EAP
> type name, abstracting that would be useful.  That way the document name
> will not change no matter what the WG decides to do.
> 
>   Anyone with opinions either way is requested to discuss the pros and
> cons of the issue.

There seem to be two issues here: renaming the draft & allocating a new
EAP type.  For which one are opinions being solicited?

...

<<attachment: gwz.vcf>>

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to