On 5/15/2011 2:36 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>> "Alan" == Alan DeKok <al...@deployingradius.com> writes: > > Alan> Glen Zorn wrote: > >> There seem to be two issues here: renaming the draft & allocating > >> a new EAP type. For which one are opinions being solicited? > > Alan> Allocating a new EAP type. > > My opinion is that we have two options: > > 1) Allocate a new method type now. > > 2) Revisit this issue at the end. > > I don't think we'll be in a position to decide for sure we can keep the > method type until we reach WGLC.
I don't follow your logic here. Allocating a new EAP type is, practically speaking, nothing. > > However we can always short-circuit the issue early. The only question I can see is whether or not emu really is an extension of the Cisco marketing department. One would like to think that the answer is obvious but maybe not... ...
<<attachment: gwz.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
