On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Yoshihiro Ohba wrote: > Hi Sam, > > Since authorization and accounting with the use of the > pre-authentication may be different from those with the use of normal > authentication, it would be good to differentiate pre-auth and without > pre-auth for network access authentication protocols that support > pre-authentication, PANA and 802.11 are such protocols as far as I know. > > BTW, I also commented about adding IEEE 802.16m and IEEE 802.21a for > EAP lower-layers. Here is the references for them: > > IEEE 802.16m: "Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - > Part 16: Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access Systems - > Advanced Air Interface", IEEE 802.16m-2011, 2011. >
[Joe] How does 802.16m differ from 802.16e? > IEEE 802.21a: "Draft Standard for Local and metropolitan area > networks-Part 21: Media Independent Handover Services Amendment 2: > Security Extensions to Media Independent Handover Services and > Protocol", IEEE P802.21a/D04, 2011. > [Joe] I'd rather not include draft specifications in this document. > Regards, > Yoshihiro Ohba > > > (2011/10/20 4:59), Sam Hartman wrote: >> Hi. I've added PANA (pre-authentication). >> >> I wonder about the whole lower layer table. >> Why is it important to distinguish PANA with pre-auth from pana without >> pre-auth? >> >> Why is it important to distinguish 802.11 wpa, wpa2 and wpa2 with >> pre-auth? >> >> I'd appreciate it if someone who cared about network access told me what >> to do here:-) >> > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
