-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/17/2014 06:16 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On 16/03/2014 12:21, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
>> On 03/15/2014 02:28 PM, Egbert van der Wal wrote:
>>> I actually see encryption as less of an issue. When I send an 
>>> encrypted message to someone, I need to know for sure that the
>>>  recipient knows about PGP encryption and knows how to decode
>>> it. If I send an encrypted message to someone who does not use
>>> PGP, he/she cannot read it, no matter what.
> 
>> How do you send an encrypted message to someone who does not use 
>> PGP? You need his public key to do that.
> 
> I think that is the point that he was making - his reason for
> thinking that encryption is a lesser issue.
> 
> Anne

When his sentence starts out "If I send an encrypted message to
someone who does not use PGP, ..." he is already lacking understanding
since he CANNOT send an encrypted message to someone using enigmail if
he does not have that someone's public key.

And if that someone does not use enigmail (or something very much like
it), he better not send that message at all (if it really needed to be
encrypted).

I never benefit from enigmail because I cannot get any of my
correspondents to use it at all. In fact, many of them prefer Facebook
or their cell phones to send me messages. And while I have SSL turned
on with Facebook, I very much doubt that Facebook itself, on their
servers, keeps my messages encrypted even though they seem to be
during transmission.

My impression is that with all the hand-wringing about the NSA and
other agencies snooping on Internet communication, most people, or at
least most of my friends, do not actually care about Internet privacy.

Even with gnupg and enigmail, the headers are all exposed, but that is
another story.

- -- 
  .~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
  /V\  PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine  1935521.
 /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://linuxcounter.net
 ^^-^^ 07:00:01 up 4 days, 16:02, 2 users, load average: 4.20, 4.22, 4.46
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTJtePAAoJEBZthAoMYQyLCQ4H/33LaqWjahiEzPCTwBND11+m
trwV+nuOIK8x/oSpIDzEJnHWm6AbIGsotju2bjRdnlkIKYdmBJLU4X79vUcNPzRR
YE3wyUxSkwFHdPnIm0YXGpZbUe/lVT9B2yoqIQyS4vyCIQu3vu4e5XbJB7AOjiOf
Ni1n3OWiEhLe0/PZHE7iakpfJPLzaA+jvrOOhcdtCUWEJoe5ioGCZ/fiifxlNktz
8U1xZZJhqztO7qsM+TkHVFosp7+wcEgQWE53tlA5o8gvM21VhTi5yZg7GRhOGFTd
uzJvnELydTePRaht8LJdVJru+cSdIHALCFfYc4rqcLhHtRM4xkB6u/cRHv35QdY=
=gHjd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Reply via email to