On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:01:15 -0400 Michael writes:
> On Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 23:33:18 (-0400),
> Jose O Gonzalez wrote:
>
> > I remember reading once, long ago, an interview by an excited
> > newcomer named Michael Jennings.. an interview he did of two, more
> > or less, old-timers known as "raster" and "mandrake".
>
> You are mistaken. Was I a newcomer once? Yes, absolutely, though
> it's been almost 10 years. But I'd been around for quite awhile by
> the time mandrake showed up.
>
Perhaps so... I'd defer to raster and mandrake and you on that.
As I *dimly* recall, this was around the time of the unveiling of
e16 and eterm (my first experience with e was around e13 and I can't
recall if eterm was around then), and you certainly *seemed* to come
across, in that interview, as an excited newcomer -- to enlightenment.
But if you were instead an *excited old-timer*, then even better :)
If anyone can find a link to that interview somewhere, I'm sure
everyone would find it an interesting read :)
> > If ewl is indeed the "official" gui toolkit of enlightenment, and
> it
> > is the result of years of work... then how is it that none of the
> > major programs that are associated as being "e"... actually use
> it?
> > None do.
>
> Also not true.
>
Ummm... that would very much depend on what one's list of *major*
programs associated as being "e"... consists of.
Perhaps you could give your list of such and pick out those that
use ewl.. so that a more "official" ratio can be ascertained.
Jose.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
