On Tuesday, 29 November 2005, at 16:09:05 (+0100),
Laszlo Treszkai wrote:

> I think this is the same situation, and we know xcomp is gone for a
> long time,

No, we do not.

> and I'm sure he would give to anyone the right to maintain and own
> it, as I read him saying he CAN'T be active.

I'd read it again, then.

> And he's not here and responsive.

I think the person who's chatting on IRC right now using the nickname
"xcomp" would disagree with that assertion.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "We're going to take a break and go outside for about 15 minutes.
  Security advises us that this would be a good idea." -- Bill Poucher


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to