That’s because we are using dokuwiki format. If we switch then the document
about formatting switches...
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 23:28, Simon Lees <sfl...@suse.de> wrote:

>
>
> On 18/10/17 23:18, Andrew Williams wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given that the syntax info page is included in our content I don't
> > understand the question. If we update the documents that people follow
> then
> > anyone who is not familiar with MarkDown does as they did before - read
> the
> > docs?
> > Or did I miss something?
> >
>
> Last time I edited a page the systax info page was the generic dokuwiki
> syntax one not a Markdown one (I don't know how different they are)
>
> > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 12:51 Simon Lees <sfl...@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 18/10/17 19:47, Andrew Williams wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am struggling with the factual inaccuracies - phab is not markdown
> >> (they
> >>> call it "similar to"
> >>> https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/remarkup/),
> >> trac is
> >>> not markdown (it is inspired by previous wikis
> >>> https://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/WikiFormatting) but all of this is
> >>> irrelevant to the point.
> >>>
> >>> MarkDown is a common format that many have extended. Case in point - we
> >>> were working on some documentation last night and one of the group did
> >> not
> >>> want to put it in the wiki yet so they uploaded it to github
> temporarily.
> >>> And you know what? Their web engine automatically formatted it
> correctly
> >> -
> >>> I then loaded it into dokuwiki with markdown enabled and the same
> thing -
> >>> the content, heirarchy, markup and syntax highlighting all just worked.
> >>> Whether we like it or not GitHub has changed the way that people think
> >>> about social coding and their adoption of Markdown has had a big impact
> >> on
> >>> people using it as a standard (there are book authoring systems and
> >>> presentation apps using it as the main format).
> >>>
> >>> What I was proposing is to use MarkDown instead of Dokuwiki syntax (due
> >> to
> >>> the benefits already listed) and this has no bearing on the choice of
> >>> dokuwiki or the functionality - it is merely the syntax used. Online
> >>> editing works just as well, page includes also work through
> "frontmatter"
> >>> much as before. Your assertion that using any other format makes it
> >>> uneditable seems completely untrue - what is causing your concern here?
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible that in this discussion we have confused the word
> dokuwiki
> >>> as a format and dokuwiki as a product?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Whenever i've manually updated our wiki pages (or any wiki pages) I
> >> always reference the provided help to use the correct syntax, so how
> >> would use ensure that anyone editing the documentation via the wiki
> >> (which is why its a wiki in the first place) will use markdown
> >> formatting rather then wiki formatting?
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Simon Lees (Simotek)                            http://simotek.net
> >>
> >> Emergency Update Team                           keybase.io/simotek
> >> SUSE Linux                           Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
> >> GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> >>
>
> --
>
> Simon Lees (Simotek)                            http://simotek.net
>
> Emergency Update Team                           keybase.io/simotek
> SUSE Linux                           Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
> GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
-- 
http://andywilliams.me
http://ajwillia.ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to