On Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:46:41 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> said:
i'd have to disagree on it being misleading... :/ > Hi, > > Whilst writing the docs we have realised that efl_ref_get is a slightly > misleading method name as it returns the reference count. Whilst we are > breaking APIs for our first interfaces release would people mind me > changing efl_ref_get to efl_refcount_get (as per this eo patch, and all the > efl ramifications). > > I'd prefer not to leave the old method in place but could do so if you > think there is a big problem making this breaking change? > > Thanks :) > Andy > > > -- > http://andywilliams.me > http://ajwillia.ms -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
