Hi all, After a chat on IRC we settled on efl_ref_count( Unless anyone comes up with reasons not to I will apply this change later today.
Andy On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 09:53 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> wrote: > Can you please explain why? This is a method that returns a count of > references but has no mention of count in the name. > We have ref_add and wref_add that are talking about actual references but > ref_get returns a count? > This is misleading. > > Andy > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 09:49 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:46:41 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> >> said: >> >> i'd have to disagree on it being misleading... :/ >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Whilst writing the docs we have realised that efl_ref_get is a slightly >> > misleading method name as it returns the reference count. Whilst we are >> > breaking APIs for our first interfaces release would people mind me >> > changing efl_ref_get to efl_refcount_get (as per this eo patch, and all >> the >> > efl ramifications). >> > >> > I'd prefer not to leave the old method in place but could do so if you >> > think there is a big problem making this breaking change? >> > >> > Thanks :) >> > Andy >> > >> > >> > -- >> > http://andywilliams.me >> > http://ajwillia.ms >> >> >> -- >> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- >> Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com >> >> -- > http://andywilliams.me > http://ajwillia.ms > -- http://andywilliams.me http://ajwillia.ms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
