Can you please explain why? This is a method that returns a count of references but has no mention of count in the name. We have ref_add and wref_add that are talking about actual references but ref_get returns a count? This is misleading.
Andy On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 09:49 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > On Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:46:41 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@andywilliams.me> > said: > > i'd have to disagree on it being misleading... :/ > > > Hi, > > > > Whilst writing the docs we have realised that efl_ref_get is a slightly > > misleading method name as it returns the reference count. Whilst we are > > breaking APIs for our first interfaces release would people mind me > > changing efl_ref_get to efl_refcount_get (as per this eo patch, and all > the > > efl ramifications). > > > > I'd prefer not to leave the old method in place but could do so if you > > think there is a big problem making this breaking change? > > > > Thanks :) > > Andy > > > > > > -- > > http://andywilliams.me > > http://ajwillia.ms > > > -- > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com > > -- http://andywilliams.me http://ajwillia.ms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
