Hmm... do we really need to get a review for this kind of small fix? At least, committers are proved, definitely know some patches are just about trivial fix, not necessary get a review.
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Marcel Hollerbach < m...@marcel-hollerbach.de> wrote: > hermet pushed a commit to branch master. > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id= > c44c1e2ea077dc689f52239ff341b546e95f2480 > > commit c44c1e2ea077dc689f52239ff341b546e95f2480 > Author: Marcel Hollerbach <m...@marcel-hollerbach.de> > Date: Mon Jun 25 14:25:52 2018 +0900 > > efl_gfx_path: make counters unsigned > > Summary: > we are comparing to unsigned number, and the number are moving strongly > from 0 up. > Depends on D6380 > > Reviewers: devilhorns > > Subscribers: Hermet, cedric, #committers, zmike > > Tags: #efl > > Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6381 > --- > src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c > b/src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c > index ca3a842b99..97439c0fee 100644 > --- a/src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c > +++ b/src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c > @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ _efl_gfx_path_interpolate(Eo *obj, Efl_Gfx_Path_Data > *pd, > { > double *to_pts = to_pd->points; > double *from_pts = from_pd->points; > - int i, j; > + unsigned int i, j; > > for (i = 0; cmds[i] != EFL_GFX_PATH_COMMAND_TYPE_END; > i++) > for (j = 0; j < _efl_gfx_path_command_length(cmds[i]); > j++) > > -- > > > -- Regards, Hermet ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
