Actually, that will be better If patches could get in after good reviews.
However if the patches are very small trivial changes just like this case
(no logical changes, fix just typo, fix simple compile warning, etc..
well I feel it's too burdensome than we can obtain.

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:48:54 +0900 Hermet Park <hermetp...@gmail.com>
> said:
>
> > Hmm... do we really need to get a review for this kind of small fix?
> > At least, committers are proved, definitely know some patches are just
> > about trivial fix, not necessary get a review.
>
> if they wish to make work for themselves and others ... they are free to
> do so.
> review is not a requirement in efl or e etc. if you have commit access.
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Marcel Hollerbach <
> > m...@marcel-hollerbach.de> wrote:
> >
> > > hermet pushed a commit to branch master.
> > >
> > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=
> > > c44c1e2ea077dc689f52239ff341b546e95f2480
> > >
> > > commit c44c1e2ea077dc689f52239ff341b546e95f2480
> > > Author: Marcel Hollerbach <m...@marcel-hollerbach.de>
> > > Date:   Mon Jun 25 14:25:52 2018 +0900
> > >
> > >     efl_gfx_path: make counters unsigned
> > >
> > >     Summary:
> > >     we are comparing to unsigned number, and the number are moving
> strongly
> > >     from 0 up.
> > >     Depends on D6380
> > >
> > >     Reviewers: devilhorns
> > >
> > >     Subscribers: Hermet, cedric, #committers, zmike
> > >
> > >     Tags: #efl
> > >
> > >     Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6381
> > > ---
> > >  src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c
> > > b/src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c
> > > index ca3a842b99..97439c0fee 100644
> > > --- a/src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c
> > > +++ b/src/lib/efl/interfaces/efl_gfx_path.c
> > > @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ _efl_gfx_path_interpolate(Eo *obj,
> Efl_Gfx_Path_Data
> > > *pd,
> > >                 {
> > >                    double *to_pts = to_pd->points;
> > >                    double *from_pts = from_pd->points;
> > > -                  int i, j;
> > > +                  unsigned int i, j;
> > >
> > >                    for (i = 0; cmds[i] !=
> EFL_GFX_PATH_COMMAND_TYPE_END;
> > > i++)
> > >                      for (j = 0; j < _efl_gfx_path_command_length(
> cmds[i]);
> > > j++)
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards, Hermet
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> >
>
>
> --
> ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com
>
>


-- 
Regards, Hermet
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to