On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:27:51 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:45:00 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
> 
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:28:07 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 7/16/07, David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > So you are you complaining about API changes breaking the CVS
> > > > > build and not getting fixed,
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > 
> > > This is actually a series of problems, not just one person taking
> > > the time to fix CVS, though that is part of it. It also indicates
> > > we are lacking good review of changes, user feedback is not
> > > reaching the developers that will fix it, and maintainers are not
> > > updating their module as dependency changes occur.
> > > 
> > > An automated nightly build could improve the build break
> > > detection.
> > 
> > I do a mostly regular build of almost everything, which is why I
> > notice these things.  I'll be happy to setup regular automated
> > builds.
> > 
> > Where would an automated nightly build best be run?  Where would the
> > results be delivered?   Since we are scattered all over the planet,
> > whose night should be used to define "nightly"?
> 
> we have servers! e1.enlightenment.org and e2.enlightenment.org. we
> can install any locally required packages for builds and have them
> automated. build + install (into a specific prefix - eg /opt/e17).
> only a matter of scripting it up so it is automated and won't fail if
> not done as root (we need to do it as a user here for security
> reasons considering what a build can actually do). currently the
> builds should not fail if done as a user.

Still working on the automation script.  Should have a first cut result
available in an hour.

> > Many other questions need to be answered to set this up.
> > 
> > Off the top of my head.  sf.net has a compile farm that can be used
> > for such things and I already use it for another project.  Then we
> > can do builds on several platforms.  I have seen other projects get
> > the results of the nightly build sent as a single email to their dev
> > mailing list each night.
> 
> aaah - other platforms - that is a problem. we can do a nightly build
> for at least x86 (and x86_64). that should be sufficient for us for
> now. other arches are good - but we only have so much in the way of
> resources. we could do ARM builds via scratchbox the same way we do
> x86/x86_64 easily. i assume ppc could be done in a similar way if
> someone wants to set up a scratchbox ppc env.

Think I can scare up some PPC build boxen.  B-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to