On Nov 6, 2007 2:24 PM, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a good chance that we would lose our primary repository > hosting if we made this transition, which means additional load on our > two servers. While they are not struggling under the current load, it > is something to keep in mind.
Well, we could do the opposite of I'm doing today: develop on GIT and have public access using CVS, setting up a bridge GIT->CVS is more reliable than CVS->GIT. Well, the load will be lower, since every developer will have the copy of the whole repository, no operations other than pull/push will go to server. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri -------------------------------------- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ#: 17249123 Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
