On Nov 19, 2007 12:02 PM, Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sebastian Dransfeld schrieb: > > Andre Magalhaes wrote: > > > >> On Nov 18, 2007 11:09 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:02:40 +0100 "Jorge Luis Zapata Muga" > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > >>> > >>> my plan was just to split it with no renaming. ecore builds as ecore. > >>> ecore_evas builds as ecore_evas with its own configure etc. no need to > >>> change > >>> names of api calls etc. at all. this won't break any apps (maybe just the > >>> configure scripts as the pkgconfig stuff will split).. and thus this can > >>> be > >>> punted off until later. > >>> > >> That would be easy to do, and afaik no app would have to change its > >> configure script, as most of > >> the ecore libs (if not all) already have their own pkgconfig files. > >> What about the Ecore_Support that > >> this thread was about, hehe. Are you interested in it? Should we > >> change Ecore_Data.h or should > >> we add a new Ecore_Support.h (EAPI definitions, ECORE_MAGIC_CHECK, ...) > >> and include it on Ecore.h so it wouldn't break anything? I really > >> dislike to have to copy, paste code > >> all over the place. > >> > > > > Why in Ecore_Data.h and not in Ecore.h? > > > Maybe because Ecore_Data shouldn't depend on Ecore (after a split). > > But is it really reasonable to split ecore in such small parts? In > particular when you think on ecore_txt (1 function) or ecore_job (1 + 3 > functions).
Yes i agree, those are too small and the split doesn't worth. I think the split makes sense in subsystems like ecore_x, ecore_[direct]fb, ecore_evas, etc, i.e large subsystems and subsystems that aren't needed in the main loop *core* (the above mentioned are some kind of extensions to it, new event types, etc). > > > Peter > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
