Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
> Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
>> But is it really reasonable to split ecore in such small parts? In 
>> particular when you think on ecore_txt (1 function) or ecore_job (1 + 3 
>> functions).

> Another point in splitting should be to make ecore_evas check engines 
> runtime and not compile time.

Yeah, I'd like to see that as well, i.e. for embedded systems.

Regards,

:M:
-- 
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | IT-Freelancer | http://www.vanille-media.de


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to