On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 20:38:46 (+0200), Vincent Torri wrote: > I have no design, but i have already complained about the web site > on the ML. I'm not a good designers, but i think that there are some > things that MUST appear on a web site.
All I'm saying is, if something better had come along, I'm sure raster would've considered it. Nothing did, until now. > Also, in case you don't know, Dan did a BIG job so that all the doxy > doc geenrating by gendoc look like the website, so modifying the > website is not so simple if we want to have something that is > coherent. That's true, and that needs to be taken into consideration. Also I believe Mediawiki and Vanilla were themed to match the website. That work would also need to be redone. > so, ok, one guy is doing the website, he takes a huge amount of time > to do it, and then we say : "Ho no, that web site is not good > !". And a guy or antoehr will do the same thing, etc... I think that > the time we loose discussing a bit (not a lot, during several weeks) > about the web site is nothing if the web site is not godd and needs > rewriting. That's a fair and valid opinion. But the choice on whether or not to discuss something publically before doing the work is a personal one because the person making the choice (and doing the work) is the only one who stands to lose anything. > you're a stupid guy Surely we're all adults here and can keep our discussions mature and cordial. There is no need for ad hominem attacks. You're the one doing the Win32 ports, so my point about closed source software not having the "benevolent dictatorship" model turned out to be humorous. Thus, the joke. No offense was intended. > I agree. And that's exactly the opposite of raster's way of leading > the project. He said that a lot, btw : he does NOT want to impose > things to committers. So why are you afraid he'll do so? > I will never be offended by something that is imposed if i am warned > first. If i'm warned and I does nothing, then it's my fault. If one > impose me without warn me and I don't like, I will say why i do not > agree. It sounds like you feel someone is *already* imposing something on you. Is that correct? If so, perhaps if you could explain what has been done that you feel is imposing on you, it could be corrected. I don't think Inc is trying to impose his will on anyone. >> A "community" is "a body of people having common rights, >> privileges, or interests." That says nothing about everyone having >> to have everything they do approved by committee before they're >> allowed to do it. If that were the way things worked around here, >> we'd never get anywhere. > > I do not agree, i have another view of a community than yours. Well, that's the dictionary definition of community, so... :) Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "My shoes are too tight, but it doesn't matter because I have forgotten how to dance." -- Peter Jurasik (Ambassador Londo Mollari), "Babylon Five" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel