dan sinclair wrote:
> ....
>> License
>>
>>
>
> I won't help if it's LGPL. I also won't link to it in my code as I
> won't fix bugs in it.
>
> dan
>
I have to respect your strong and decisive view here, certainly your
decision to not contribute to a library under a license you feel so strongly
uncomfortable with. Though if you're going to be consistent in this view,
and especially about your refusal to not link against such libs, then you
may want to stop linking against *all* the other lgpl ones you have been linking
with for a very long time now.
Inspired by your decisive views here, I too feel an urge to not contribute
any further to libs under a license I don't feel comfortable with, in my case
that being those under a bsd license.
jose
____________________________________________________________
Embrace e-commerce and sell your products or services online. Click now!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3nqojD0cAXN9TjqZoVHn5YQiFlffxbiGbNyNFhnc3BBBwH4G/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
