On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > People like Cedric and Gustavo and their companies are more open minded > than you. Their companies work with and on the efl. With he BSD licence, > their work can be stolen. But They are sufficiently aware of the > powerfulness of the efl and open minded to allow them to share code. > Without that open-minded-ness, such improvements woud never have hit cvs. It's not about being "open-minded" here. Companies use EFL commercially because they can do their job with those libs, then they contribute back to the project. Like Apple and the BSD stuff it's using. And, as one of the arguments to move TO BSD years ago was that open source code CAN be stolen no matter what the license is.. well, it's still true. > > > That library is not a big one, it's not the most powerful lib on earth. > Just a data type lib. You do not want to help, well, if you don't like > LGPL, why not. But not linking against it, it's completely crazy. Exactly. If every other library and app in the project's official source tree, a big or a small one, is BSD-licensed, well, let's just keep the consistency. I really don't see a reason to move to LGPL. I know that as Im not a dev my opinion means nothing, but thats my two cents. -- Luchezar P. Petkov http://luchko.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
