On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 23:23:11 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:05:33 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:19 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > and i want to put in other cvs modules: > > > misc/ -> misc/ > > > eterm/ -> old/eterm/ > > > web/www -> www/ > > > e16/ -> old/e16/ > > > e_modules/ -> apps/e_modules > > > > Since both Eterm and e16 are actively maintained and use some of the > > libs under libs, wouldn't it make sense for them to be under apps? > > There are still plenty of users for them and placing them under old > > seems like tagging them for near-term deprecation to me. > > well - eterm is pretty much static. it does get the odd commit. e16 - > yes. active, but it is the predecessor to e17 and i'd like to move > things into an according place. something dead/old should go there - > including old libs and apps that are basically dead or non-actively > worked on. Then perhaps large amounts of misc/ should go into old/?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
