On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:45:42 +0300 Viktor Kojouharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 01:27 +1000, David Seikel wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 23:23:11 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:05:33 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:19 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > and i want to put in other cvs modules: > > > > > misc/ -> misc/ > > > > > eterm/ -> old/eterm/ > > > > > web/www -> www/ > > > > > e16/ -> old/e16/ > > > > > e_modules/ -> apps/e_modules > > > > > > > > Since both Eterm and e16 are actively maintained and use some > > > > of the libs under libs, wouldn't it make sense for them to be > > > > under apps? There are still plenty of users for them and > > > > placing them under old seems like tagging them for near-term > > > > deprecation to me. > > > > > > well - eterm is pretty much static. it does get the odd commit. > > > e16 - yes. active, but it is the predecessor to e17 and i'd like > > > to move things into an according place. something dead/old should > > > go there - including old libs and apps that are basically dead or > > > non-actively worked on. > > > > Then perhaps large amounts of misc/ should go into old/? > > is there anything under misc that is currently usable? Yes, some of it is even maintained.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
