On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:03:48 +0000 Andrew Williams <a...@handyande.co.uk> said:

> You can of course have both.
> Generate a ChangeLog file from the subversion logs and have a  
> subversion hook update this everytime a change is made...
> Would that keep everyone happy?

i'd have no problem with this. as for 1.0 for stuff (and 0.17.0 for e17) i
would like to keep good changelogs kept - as when a release *IS* made then the
changelog is already up to date for the release tarball.

> Andy
> 
> On 30 Jan 2009, at 19:23, Vincent Torri wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >
> >> I really dislike ChangeLog files, they predate any source control
> >> version. Now CVS/SVN/Git/Whatever nicely replaces that. So generating
> >> it automatically is the way to go.
> >
> > of course I disagree. Mainly because of an experience i had with
> > autotools: for the EFL, I had to check if I didn't use macros that  
> > were
> > too recent, or on the contrary if they were old enough to replace  
> > them by
> > newer ones. If I had to look at all the svn logs, i doubt that i would
> > have finished that work today (there are a lot of macro / features in
> > autoconf, automake and libtool).
> >
> > On the contrary, I just opened the ChangeLog files, did a search in  
> > it,
> > and it was quite fast for me to find the informations.
> >
> > That's why I think that, if it helped me, a changeLog can help other
> > people. Note that I agree with raster's position here: noting in a
> > ChangeLog only the most important changes. For example, even if I had
> > committed in eet repo (only formatting and autotools stuff, iirc), i
> > didn't modified the ChangeLog (Well, actually, i added one entry, to
> > mention that the compilation can be done with Visual Studio). So the
> > ChangeLog does not grows too much and has only important cahnges in  
> > it.
> >
> > That's my opinion as a user of a tool. And i think that there are a  
> > lot of
> > users who don't know how to use cvs, svn or git and are quite happy to
> > have some ChangeLog files.
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> > SourcForge Community
> > SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> > _______________________________________________
> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> >
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to