On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:42 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:07:39 +0200 Oguz Yarimtepe <comp....@gmail.com> said:
>
>> > use: keyword ":" value for edc, "," will be deprecated. like "color:
>> > 255 255 255 255"
>> >
>>
>> Ok i changed ","s with ":"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Have you cross compiled the libs with -O2 or -Os? Going without
>> > compile flags is bad.
>> >
>>
>> Yes i have export CFLAGS="-g -O2";
>>
>>
>> >
>> > mine is 332 bogomips, but arm xscale.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > make sure it is using dfb acceleration and no DBF_USE_EVAS_* is set,
>> > since they would use software and it's almost impossible to paint
>> > 1024x768 at 60Hz using 296 bogomips processor :-)
>> >
>>
>> It is not using softwareFB,. DBF_USE_EVAS_* values are commented
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > It would be nice to compile expedite and check results. It will test
>> > most common operations and you can use that to compare with other
>> > systems.
>>
>>
>> Here is some outputs with expedite:
>>
>> 0.76 , Image Blend Unscaled
>> 15.05 , Image Blend Solid Unscaled
>> 10.40 , Image Blend Smooth Solid Scaled
>> 9.69 , Image Quality Scale
>> 8.51 , Image Data ARGB
>> 2.99 , Image Data ARGB Alpha
>> 7.01 , Image Data YCbCr 601 Pointer List
>> 3.29 , Image Crossfade
>> 4.25 , Text Change
>> 6.32 , Textblock Basic
>> 1847.34 , Textblock Intl
>> 0.55 , Rect Blend
>> 10.91 , Rect Solid
>> 36.71 , Rect Blend Few
>> 48.58 , Rect Solid Few
>> 6.34 , Image Blend Occlude 3 Few
>> 48.59 , Rect Solid Few
>> 8.79 , Text Basic
>>
>> In general only a few of them are running fast. Values between 10-15 is
>> bearable. But values with 0 starting values are realy unbearable slow. Also
>> image_blend_nearast_scale, image_blend_smooth_scaled are so slow. But
>> image_blend_smoot_solid_scale is faster. test_style_different_string is also
>> working slow.
>>
>> Can the problem be the directfb version? The current system have directfb
>> v1.0rc1 installed. Do you think i should upgrade it?
>
> this pretty much tells the problem. the ONLY test it seems to properly
> accelerate is the textblock intl test. unless something drastic went wrong
> here, but those numbers are very low for accelerated rendering on any device -
> that smells like software. very bad software too.
>
> try software_x11 or fb egnine of evas to compare with "pure software":
>
> expedite -e x11
> expedite -e fb
or recompile directfb engine with:
make uninstall clean
CFLAGS="-DDFB_USE_EVAS_IMAGE_DRAW=1 -DDFB_USE_EVAS_RECT_DRAW=1
-DDFB_USE_EVAS_POLYGON_DRAW=1 -DDFB_UPDATE_INDIVIDUAL_RECTS=1"
./configure --options...
make all install
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--------------------------------------
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
