On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Kim Woelders wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:27:38 +0200, Michael Jennings <m...@kainx.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 06 October 2009, at 21:52:42 (+0200),
>> Kim Woelders wrote:
>>
>>> It seems to me that you are making Eterm e17 compliant in stead of
>>> making
>>> e17 MWM hint compliant.
>>
>> I think he did that too.  My thought was to make Eterm more EWMH
>> compliant.  Do you feel that this patch fails to accomplish that?
>>
> In my opinion the MWM hint is not related to EWMH, so I think all that is
> accomplished is to fetch a potentially rather large atom list which
> shouldn't contain the item being looked for :)

the MWM hint is not part of EWMH

see http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-1.3.html#id2507144

(the paragraph beginning by 'Rationale')

Vincent

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to