On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Brian Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:43:49 +0800 Brian Wang <[email protected]> >> said: >> >> ok. leak was actually something else. the below leak report seems totally odd >> to me - doesn't make sense given the code. > > That one seems to be plugged. Thanks. :-) > > There are more like this: > ==29708== 2,976 (256 direct, 2,720 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are > definitely lost in loss record 2,066 of 2,134 > ==29708== at 0x4025016: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:525) > ==29708== by 0x4498966: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.4.4) > ==29708== by 0x44993C4: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.4.4) > ==29708== by 0x4499B1B: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.4.4) > ==29708== by 0x4499BFC: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.4.4) > ==29708== by 0x448C160: FcDefaultSubstitute (in > /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.4.4) > ==29708== by 0x40A7E58: evas_font_load (evas_font_dir.c:457) > ==29708== by 0x409149C: evas_object_text_font_set (evas_object_text.c:218) > ==29708== by 0x47134D0: _edje_part_recalc_single_text (edje_calc.c:865) > ==29708== by 0x47147AC: _edje_part_recalc_single (edje_calc.c:1319) > ==29708== by 0x47161FE: _edje_part_recalc (edje_calc.c:1867) > ==29708== by 0x4711C84: _edje_recalc_do (edje_calc.c:253) > > Is it libfontconfig or EFL problem? It's kind of cryptic to me... Iirc, raster removed the shut down of fontconfig. I don't remember the reason, though Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
