On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Michael Jennings <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm all for consistency, and this is certainly a great tool for > producing that consistency, but shouldn't a concensus be reached > amongst the developers for stylistic personal preference changes as > opposed to actual algorithmic correctness? >
I agree. But this is not *my* preference, it's EFL style as far as I know. I may be wrong though. I tried to cover all the possible cases and the only exceptions were when it's wrong not using E [=!]= NULL. I have the patch for all the other libraries as well. Raster, k-s, others, what do you think? Can I apply for the other ones? Lucas De Marchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
