At Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:44:45 -0200,
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > At Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:33:44 +0900,
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> as such i think we should move emotion itself to LGPL anyway - it's bsd 
> >> now.
> >> anyone disagree (this means for GPL modules like clv and xine emotion 
> >> itself is
> >> always compliant and compliance is then pushed off onto the apps that ship 
> >> as
> >> part of a complete system that may only have gstreamer or may have xine or 
> >> vlc
> >> or all 3).
> >
> > Shouldn't the situation be the same as you've described with a
> > 2-clause BSD license as well?
> 
> Damn, it took us ages to convince raster to give up on his rage that
> lead to BSD thing and now you want him to stop!? :-)  IMO all EFL
> should be LGPL.

But hey, I'm writing this mail from a FreeBSD system, so I'm biased to
the other side of the force.

--
Raphael Kubo da Costa
ProFUSION embedded systems
http://profusion.mobi

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to