On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:42:09 -0200 Raphael Kubo da Costa <[email protected]> said:
> At Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:33:44 +0900, > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > as such i think we should move emotion itself to LGPL anyway - it's bsd now. > > anyone disagree (this means for GPL modules like clv and xine emotion > > itself is always compliant and compliance is then pushed off onto the apps > > that ship as part of a complete system that may only have gstreamer or may > > have xine or vlc or all 3). > > Shouldn't the situation be the same as you've described with a > 2-clause BSD license as well? yes. but bsd doesnt require shipping source of emotion - we won't enforce it. no need. the copyright holders of gpl libs emotin uses can enforce it by requesting source to emotion and apps that use it. i just was going to say that we may as well make emotion lgpl to make that level at least "already handled". when this happens. the apps or libs on top are a separate matter though. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
