It sends a normal kill to the process of the current window. Works for me most of the time (for example if Firefox hangs).
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:21:43PM -0500, Jeff Hoogland wrote: > What does the kill command actually do? I find it doesn't work here most > times, but running *killall -9 pname* in terminal works fine. > > ~Jeff > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy < > morlen...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > Well i think current shortcut list suffers most peoples need, so i for > > example use always on top and sticky most often. > > Kill is somehow special, people wouldn't know where to search for that > > option as killing a window wouldn't always mean that the whole application > > is killed - others might expect a kill feature in the application submenu. > > So that's why close and kill are placed at the toplevel... Let's keep them > > there... > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:50:53PM +0000, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > > Always on top is used a lot by a lot of people. Stick: maybe you are > > > right and it's not used a lot, but when it is, you probably want to get > > > there without too much of an hassle. Kill maybe doesn't belong there, > > > that's true. > > > > > > I'm willing to agree on everything except for always on top, this one > > > should be top level, I have no doubt about it :) > > > > > > -- > > > Tom. > > > > > > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:44 +0000, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Tom Hacohen > > > > <tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com> wrote: > > > > > Godly, awesome :P > > > > > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > > > > > Btw, the shortcuts currently there are: > > > > > * Send to desktop. > > > > > * Always on top. > > > > > * Sticky. > > > > > > > > Argh, these, together with "Kill", are not something we should have > > > > such high priority. I mean, how many times you turn your windows > > > > stick? How about to kill it? > > > > Send to desktop may be reasonable, if there are multiple desktops > > > > set (otherwise it wouldn't make sense)... Always on top is still "too > > > > much" IMO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet > > the > > > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > > > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your > > software > > > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > > > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > > > _______________________________________________ > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
