On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 11/11/11 19:54, Enlightenment SVN wrote: >> Log: >> back to unsigned long. code was actually correct as-is. >> > If that's actually correct, then the 'fix' for the xcb version should be > reverted also ;) so, as I said, the last argument of the XCB function is an uint32_t, and as int is always 32 bits, there's no pb Vincent > > dh > >> >> >> Author: raster >> Date: 2011-11-11 16:54:22 -0800 (Fri, 11 Nov 2011) >> New Revision: 65082 >> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/65082 >> >> Modified: >> trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_x/xlib/ecore_x_window_prop.c >> >> Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_x/xlib/ecore_x_window_prop.c >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_x/xlib/ecore_x_window_prop.c 2011-11-11 >> 21:59:02 UTC (rev 65081) >> +++ trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_x/xlib/ecore_x_window_prop.c 2011-11-12 >> 00:54:22 UTC (rev 65082) >> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ >> return -1; >> } >> for (i = 0; i< num_ret; i++) >> - val[i] = ((unsigned int *)prop_ret)[i]; >> + val[i] = ((unsigned long *)prop_ret)[i]; >> num = num_ret; >> *plst = val; >> } >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
