On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:16:17PM +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
>> so why not just do a & 0xff instead of casting ?
>
> The cast is IMO cleaner in the intentions. It also has the theoretical
> advantage of working independent of CHAR_BIT==8.

except some old Cray and some DSP, i think that all the arch have 
CHAR_BIT == 8. At least all the arch that the EFL targets

Vincent

>
> Joerg
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to