On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:48:19 +0100 michael bouchaud <michael.bouch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/12/3 Michael Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> > > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:53:37 -0800 > > "Enlightenment SVN" <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > > > > > Log: > > > eet: revert works from discomfitor. too buggy elementary segv. I'm > > pleased to > > > SPANK him :D > > > > > > Author: yoz > > > Date: 2011-12-02 09:53:37 -0800 (Fri, 02 Dec 2011) > > > New Revision: 65828 > > > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/65828 > > > > > > Modified: > > > trunk/eet/ChangeLog trunk/eet/NEWS trunk/eet/src/lib/Eet_private.h > > > trunk/eet/src/lib/Makefile.am trunk/eet/src/lib/eet_dictionary.c > > > trunk/eet/src/lib/eet_lib.c > > > > > REVERSE SPANK SPANK SPANK. > > COMPOUND INTEREST SPANK SPANK SPANK SPANK SPANK SPANK! > > > > Question: When was the last time a commit was reverted for causing > > breakage? > > Hint: despite breaking all apps during a code freeze, it was not @65619 > > Hint #2: even though it broke compile for several days, it was not @65642 > > > > Answer: @64928 was reverted because it was caused breakage AND was wrong. > > > > > > If you see something broken in trunk you have a number of options: > > 1) fix it yourself -> THIS is when spankies should be administered > > 2) tell the committer to fix it > > 3) use an older commit until it gets fixed > > > > > > Reverting commits is NOT the answer, and reverting only parts of them > > is even worse. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > Sorry but I have seen something broken. elementary_test segfault. I have > quickly investigate where does the problem. I have spotted your commit is > the problem. So I have make a quick ping to you on irc, but no response. At > this moment, I have to go. So don't have time to investigate how to fix it. > I have talked about this problem to Cedric, who said me, to revert it. > Thats why, I have revert it with a quickly friendly spanking. To tell you, > there is something wrong here. And make 'elementary' usable for other who > are not a devs. I have nothing against you. I was trying to point out that we don't revert commits. It creates a bigger hassle for someone trying to fix things, and as I've proven we've had much worse things happen than something in svn being broken for a few hours. > And if my revert was uncomplete, that's my mistake. So please accept my > apologize. > np ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
