On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 09:54:42 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> said:
> I was trying to point out that we don't revert commits. It creates a bigger actually we do. i have reverted many commits over the years... it's a judgement call. can you do a fix? or is it too complex/too big/you don't have time to fix it, AND the bug is bad (eg lots of stuff stops functioning so its usable at all anymore), then revert. the person still has the changes locally and in svn commit logs so they can re-commit this time with it working right. :) it's a judgement call at the time. definitely if i find e17 not working anymore and i'm in a text console... i'm almost definitely going to revert whatever cause me to get there... :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
