On 04/13/12 20:26, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:30:54 +0900 Jérôme Pinot <ngc...@gmail.com> said: > > > Hi, > > > > This patch bring the doxyfile of e_dbus up-to-date. > > slow friday morning is it then? :) gee! thats a lot... of... mini changes to > the comments in a build config for doxygen! :) thanks! :) in svn!
Looking for the Doxyfile in the EFL, I saw a lot of differences between libs. Some are using quite old config file (for doxygen 1.4 or 1.5, more than 4 years old now), some kept the comments (eina, eet, ...), some removed it (evas, ecore, ...). First, all the config files should be bring up-to-date. It will remove the warnings and make the doc output more consistent between the libs. Moreover, if the EFL code is going to merge in one tree, it will be easier with similar doxyfiles. Then, the question of keeping/removing the comments. It's a question of taste and does not matter much. I personnaly think that's better to keep the comments, because it's what output "doxygen -u", when you update the config file. So, it's easier to maintain in the long term. Drawback is that it makes a big config file. Vim can fold all the comments with: set fdm=expr set fde=getline(v:lnum)=~'^\\s*#'?1:0 -- Jérôme Pinot http://ngc891.blogdns.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
